Regardless of how the title of this post might sound this is not going to be another request for people to volunteer within PIUG. Instead I would like to focus on partnerships and what they mean to PIUG as an organization and to our individual members.
Somewhere, once upon a time, I heard the expression, "They like me, they really like me!". The line stuck with me since the person who uttered it seemed genuinely surprised that people would enjoy his company or appreciate what he had to offer. The same thing can be said about PIUG and our standing in the patent world and our ability to help shape and influence the emerging IP Marketplace. More and more PIUG is being approached as a group and asked to supply guidance in matters germane to patents and patent information. I mentioned this in my first post on the role we can play with the major patent offices of the world.
There are other groups and organization though, outside of the patent offices, who are interested in partnering with and cooperating with us to accomplish goals that are mutually beneficial to both groups. The first one I would like to talk about is the Association of Independent Information Professionals (AIIP).
AIIP will be familiar to many members of PIUG and in fact many of our members who own their own businesses are also members of AIIP. They are a complimentary group to ours since their members are also information professionals of all stripes. They tend to focus on the skills needed to run one's own business but since they are information professionals they are also interested in staying current in the field information retrieval, analysis and presentation. In this way, even though our main focus are different, some of our goals are aligned.
As I mentioned some of our members a also members of PIUG and with the overlap in Annual Meeting dates this year some people had a difficult decision to make about which meeting they would attend this year since they could not obviously attend both. Led by Edlyn Simmons is sub-set of our members suggested that we establish a partnership with AIIP and seek reciprocal benefits to members of our respective organizations. A few of us on the Board met wi the Chair of AIIP and it quickly became clear that a partnership between our two groups would benefit both of us.
Of course, this is not the first time PIUG has partnered with sister organizations. In the past we have co-created content with the ACS CINF division and with the SLA. In this case though we are thinking about taking things beyond co-hosting content and providing reciprocal member benefit. For instance PIUG members might be allowed to attend the AIIP meeting at the AIIP member rate and vice versa. We might also share mailing lists between our organizations and even look to provide a discount on membership dues to each other's organizations. These would be benefits that would be available to paid members of PIUG and would increase the value you receive for being a PIUG member.
So, I have a question for you that I hope at least some of you will take the time to answer in the comments; Is partnering with AIIP in this way a good idea for PIUG? Would this be a benefit of PIUG membership that you would appreciate and potentially take advantage of. In the spirit of increased knowledge sharing and participation I would like to hear from the group on whether this is a good idea before we go any further with it.
AIIP is not the only who has approached PIUG in this fashion. I was recently asked by the host of a major information based conference if I thought that PIUG members would be interested in a discounted rate for meeting attendance. If our group thinks these are a good idea and provide incentives for sustained PIUG membership and value for our members we could also think about approaching other conference organizers and like minded groups to establish partnerships. As a matter of fact, as some of you may have seen recently, the organizers of the IPWARE Summit are offering PIUG members 15% off admission. This is a great deal for members interested in this conference.
I would love to hear from as many of you as possible on the topic of PIUG partnerships either in the comments of this post or by email. I can be reached at tony@piug.org and I look forward to getting your opinions.
Thanks for your time,
Tony
Comments (6)
Jun 23, 2010
Robert E. (Bob) Buntrock says:
As one who was a member of both AIIP and PIUG for several years (I just dropped ...As one who was a member of both AIIP and PIUG for several years (I just dropped my AIIP membership this year), I think this is a good idea. Although AIIP was a good organization to belong to during the growth years of my business, it eventually became less relevant as both I and the business eased into more complete retirement (Buntrock Associates is still minimally in business). Although I did get some referrals trough my AIIP listings, most of my referrals came from elsewhere rather than my AIIP lisitings.
I never attended any AIIP meetings since they often conflicted with the Spring ACS meeting, both in timing and financially. Other members I know said the meetings were quite valuable to both them and their business. Cooperation between the two groups to try to avoid meeting conflicts would help those members with dual memberships and the possibility of discounting meeting registration would be an additional bonus. Current AIIP members can check further but a few years ago a patent specialty was listed by about 70 AIIP members. I'm sure that at least a plurality were also members of PIUG but that can be checked too. Intergroup cooperation could also be a good recruitment tool for PIUG for those AIIP patent specialists not already PIUG members. Bear in mind that the majority of AIIP members are more generalists, with some specialities (often technical), usually with a library background.
Jun 23, 2010
Kim Emmons says:
Although I'm not an Independent Information Professional, I have often considere...Although I'm not an Independent Information Professional, I have often considered joining their association, because I've heard so many good things about them over the years through my SLA affiliation. Whether you are embedded, independent, or part of a larger department, all of us should consider running our services like a business, and AIIP has great depth in this area. I think it's a good idea, and can't think of a down side.
Jun 23, 2010
Robert E. (Bob) Buntrock says:
Excellent observation, Kim, that regardless of one's employment situation, our s...Excellent observation, Kim, that regardless of one's employment situation, our services should be run like a business. I had good experience with such efforts when still employed full time. I attended a Crosby Quality course and with others in my division helped create our own quality program. In addition, in a subsequent period of managment vacuum, our searching group operated over a year as a self-managed work team. This helped my wife and I (she had experience as a secretary and managing a volunteer group) learn to do a good job operating Buntrock Associates. Advice from AIIP helped also.
As I recall, one can be an Associate Member of AIIP if not self-employed but can only be a full member if you are the head of an independent searching organization. In anticipation of loss of job, that's the route I took before forming BA. However, for reasons that I never could understand, only one person from a multi-person independent organization can be a full member of AIIP.
Jun 26, 2010
Amelia Kassel says:
Bob said: "…Only one person from a multi-person independent organization can be ...Bob said: "…Only one person from a multi-person independent organization can be a full member of AIIP."
Hi!
I'm active in AIIP and a long time member of the PIUG discussion forum. I'd like to clarify the membership requirement a bit. AIIP is an organization of individuals, which essentially is similar to SLA. SLA has an organizational membership category but the vast majority of members join as individual members to receive full benefits.
AIIP doesn't have an organizational membership category but Full Membership is available to any individual who owns at least 25% of a for-profit information services business. If there is more than one owner, all can join as Full members as long as they meet the 25% ownership requirement. If not an owner, you can join as Associate Member (already mentioned in another posting,) which has many benefits. For complete details see http://aiip.org/MembershipLevels and if I can answer any questions, I’m happy to try to help.
Aug 03, 2010
Kristin Whitman says:
I'd like to mention one other group that could provide an opportunity for partne...I'd like to mention one other group that could provide an opportunity for partnerships - the PLL - IP subgroup over at AALL (The American Association of Law Libraries). PLL-IP stands for Private Law Librarians - Intellectual Property special interest section. It's a bit of a mouthful, I know, but there are quite a few law librarians in this group who do patent searching and use all the same vendors we're accustomed to seeing at PIUG. There are some crossover folks who are members of both organizations, including Lucy Curci-Gonzalez and myself. I'm actually a co-chair of the IP group this year.
I know that the IP group at AALL would be very interested in exploring some crossover programming with PIUG members. I think we both have skills to share with each other - PIUG folks are proficient patent searchers and AALL folks are accomplished legal researchers.
The IP group does some very cool programming at the yearly AALL conference, including a vendor panel where they get representatives from some major patent search providers (Minesoft, Questel, LexisNexis, Thomson Reuters, CAS, and Dialog) up to take questions, including audience questions. I had the honor of being asked to moderate the AALL panel this year and I thought it was a great opportunity to ask about the policies and future plans of these providers. I have actually been wondering whether these vendors would also participate in a similar program at PIUG.
Aug 06, 2010
Anthony Trippe says:
This sounds like a fine idea and another organization that would interact synerg...This sounds like a fine idea and another organization that would interact synergistically with our own. Please ask someone to contact me or send me some information on who I should get in touch with by email and I will be happy to see what we can do here.